mcu student writing

Saturday, October 29, 2005

mcu student writing: Buddha and Jesus

Ideal Car for People
MCU University
黃永志 / James Huang

65624-Thu 20:20-22:05
Presentation 27-Oct-2005

◎Two items to be compared:
1. SUV (sports Utility Vehicles)

2. Compact


◎Relationship or class the two items share:
They’re both the cars that have a verity of functions. People can choose the ideal car on their mind and
match their demand.



◎Controlling idea: 3 + main + difference
Point of view: Third narrator
Verb tense: Present
Tone: Calm
Diction: Vivid








Outline------

Paragraph 1, 2--Introduction
When the average American family goes to buy a new car, it is faced with a difficult decision because of the variety of automobiles. Not all, however, are suitable for the "average" family, with its middle income and 2.3 children.
The flashy sports car and the luxury car those are not practical in this instance. Or people could make another choice to select the car after they got marry. So, most families have to choose between the SUV and the compact, both of which have good and bad features.
---------- (Thesis statement)



Paragraph 3,4-- Each function and advantage:

The compact:

1. It’s economical to run.(It doesn't use much fuel.)
2. a good car for a teenager
3. Handling.
4. Parking is not an annoying problem.
5. Easy handling in rush hour traffic.


The compact 1) gets excellent gas mileage, (about
thirty to forty miles per gallon), and with the price of gasoline climbing rapidly toward $2.00 per gallon, this is no small consideration. For this reason the compact would make an excellent second car to use on those around town errands without spending a fortune on gas. 2 For teenagers, while dating with a cute girlfriend that could spend his money on his girl rather than on gas. 3 Also, Handling is another positive factor. 4 The compact's size almost guarantees in easy operation and the ability to squeeze into those half spaces in the parking lot. 5 It doesn’t take too much space on the road.Any city driver can appreciate easy handling in rush hour traffic.


The SUV:

1. Nice choice for long vocation. (Can carry several people)
2. Large space.
3. It can equip some home appliance.
4. Powerful and secure.

The SUV, on the other hand, would be excellent for the large family. 1) If people want to have a long vacation, it has plenty of room to seat six adults with room left over for luggage, the family dogs, or other equipment and so on. 2 3 For the family that needs plenty of space in a car, it also can equip home video equipment just like television, refrigerator and dinner table that you can have a picnic at the countryside. 4 Further, the wide space makes you feel comfortable while seating on the car. When you climb up the mountain SUV have powerful force, too. And it would be more secure while driving.





Paragraph 5 – Conclusion:

In our life, almost every family couldn’t live without the car. Take a useful car for you and your family is more important that depends on your demand
Choosing between these two cars is a matter of what the family members want. If they want good mileage and handling but don't need much wide space, then the compact is ideal. If the family is more concerned with the amount of room inside the car than with the other factors, then the SUV is the car for them.



Reference:

http://utminers.utep.edu/ajkline/compare.htm
http://www.thepaperexperts.com/comparisonessay.shtml


Thursday, October 27, 2005

Complementary...Achilles

Achilles
Achilles was the son of the mortal Peleus and the Nereid Thetis. He was the mightiest of the Greeks who fought in the Trojan War, and was the hero of Homer's Iliad.
Thetis attempted unsuccessfully to make her son immortal. There are two versions of the story. In the earlier version, Thetis anointed the infant with ambrosia and then placed him upon a fire to burn away his mortal portions; she was interrupted by Peleus, whereupon she abandoned both father and son in a rage. Peleus placed the child in the care of the Centaur Chiron, who raised and educated the boy. In the later version, she held the young Achilles by the heel and dipped him in the river Styx; everything the sacred waters touched became invulnerable, but the heel remained dry and therefore unprotected.
When Achilles was a boy, the seer Calchas prophesied that the city of Troy could not be taken without his help. Thetis knew that, if her son went to Troy, he would die an early death, so she sent him to the court of Lycomedes, in Scyros; there he was hidden, disguised as a young girl. During his stay he had an affair with Lycomedes' daughter, Deidameia, and she had a son, Pyrrhus (or Neoptolemus), by him. Achilles' disguise was finally penetrated by Odysseus, who placed arms and armor amidst a display of women's finery and seized upon Achilles when he was the only "maiden" to be fascinated by the swords and shields. Achilles then went willingly with Odysseus to Troy, leading a host of his father's Myrmidons and accompanied by his tutor Phoenix and his close friend Patroclus. At Troy, Achilles distinguished himself as an undefeatable warrior. Among his other exploits, he captured twenty-three towns in Trojan territory, including the town of Lyrnessos, where he took the woman Briseis as a war-prize. Later on Agamemnon, the leader of the Greeks, was forced by an oracle of Apollo to give up his own war-prize, the woman Chryseis, and took Briseis away from Achilles as compensation for his loss. This action sparked the central plot of the Iliad, for Achilles became enraged and refused to fight for the Greeks any further. The war went badly, and the Greeks offered handsome reparations to their greatest warrior; Achilles still refused to fight in person, but he agreed to allow his friend Patroclus to fight in his place, wearing his armor. The next day Patroclus was killed and stripped of the armor by the Trojan hero Hector, who mistook him for Achilles.
Achilles was overwhelmed with grief for his friend and rage at Hector. His mother obtained magnificent new armor for him from Hephaestus, and he returned to the fighting and killed Hector. He desecrated the body, dragging it behind his chariot before the walls of Troy, and refused to allow it to receive funeral rites. When Priam, the king of Troy and Hector's father, came secretly into the Greek camp to plead for the body, Achilles finally relented; in one of the most moving scenes of the Iliad, he received Priam graciously and allowed him to take the body away.
After the death of Hector, Achilles' days were numbered. He continued fighting heroically, killing many of the Trojans and their allies, including Memnon and the Amazon warrior Penthesilia. Finally Priam's son Paris (or Alexander), aided by Apollo, wounded Achilles in the heel with an arrow; Achilles died of the wound. After his death, it was decided to award Achilles' divinely-wrought armor to the bravest of the Greeks. Odysseus and Ajax competed for the prize, with each man making a speech explaining why he deserved the honor; Odysseus won, and Ajax then went mad and committed suicide.
During his lifetime, Achilles is also said to have had a number of romantic episodes. He reportedly fell in love with Penthesilia, the Amazon maiden whom he killed in battle, and it is claimed that he married Medea.

Complemental....Oedipus Rex

Oedipus Rex
The story of Oedipus was well-known to the Ancient Greeks, but the particular form in which Sophocles chose to cast the story led Aristotle (and most subsequent critics) to consider it the most perfectly representative of all tragedies in terms of its organisation and design.

The play opens with the High Priest of Thebes beseeching King Oedipus to solve the mystery of the curse that is bringing plagues and disasters on their city. Oedipus is very proud of his ability to solve mysteries. He has freed Thebes from terror once before. The monstrous Sphinx was preying on their city and Oedipus, a stranger travelling in the area, lifted the curse by answering the riddle of the Sphinx ("What goes on four legs at morning, two legs at noon and three legs at evening?" Answer - Man). His reward was to become their King and marry Queen Jocasta, the widow of their previous King Laius (who had been murdered in suspicious circumstances). Oedipus’ and Jocasta’s has been a happy marriage blessed with children. Oedipus says that he has already sent Jocasta’s brother Creon to consult Apollo’s Oracle to find out why the plague has descended. He has also asked him, to be on the safe side, to send for Apollo’s chief prophet, the blind but wise Teiresias.

Creon returns, saying that the city is being punished for an unclean act which has gone unpunished and can only be saved by "the payment of blood for blood" and the banishment of the culprit. Oedipus naturally assumes that this refers to the murder of King Laius by un-named robbers at a cross-roads. The more immediate threat of the Sphinx had prevented a full inquiry into his death ever taking place. Oedipus decides to re-open the case, partly in case the murderers next raise their hand against him.

However, when Teiresias arrives he accuses Oedipus of being the polluter of the land, declaring "Thou art the man!" Oedipus suspects that Creon and Teiresias are plotting together, Teiresias’ accusation providing a pretext for Creon to seize the crown. He confronts Creon with this and a furious argument breaks out, calmed only by the arrival of Jocasta who mediates between her husband and brother.

Jocasta reassures Oedipus that Teiresias’ prophecy is idiotic. She gives an example from her own life of the failures of such fortune-telling. Her former husband Laius had cast out his own son to die when he was told by the oracle that this son would be his murderer, yet, in the end, Laius had been killed by robbers "at a place where three roads meet" thus falsifying the prophecy.

However, the phrase "where three roads meet" stirs a memory in Oedipus. It reminds him of a trivial incident where he had argued with an old man at a cross-roads and knocked him down. He questions Jocasta further and finds that the old man resembled Laius. One witness to the incident survives, an old servant, subsequently pensioned off and now a Shepherd. Oedipus sends for him. He is obviously somewhat worried that it is he, albeit accidentally, who has murdered the King and tells Jocasta why.

He had been brought up in Corinth, the son of King Polybus and Queen Merope. He was becoming a successful young man-about-town when a drunken stranger told him he was adopted. Despite his parents’ reassurances, Oedipus (to get to the bottom of things) consulted the Oracle at Pytho. Although the Oracle did not answer his question it did say that he was doomed to commit incest with his mother, become the parent of a "misbegotten brood" and murder his father. In horror, he left Corinth immediately and while travelling, accidentally killed a man that he confronted at cross-roads in an altercation about the right of way. However, Oedipus clings on to one thing; the witnesses all spoke of "robbers" in the plural, whereas, in the incident he is thinking of, he was very obviously on his own. He tells Jocasta that he has sent for the shepherd to confirm this and thus clear his name.

At this point, a Messenger arrives from Corinth, with the news that Oedipus’ father, King Polybus, has died a natural death. Jocasta is delighted at this further proof of the failure of oracles, but Oedipus, although relieved that he has not killed his father, remains worried so long as his mother is alive. The messenger butts in to reassure him. He tells Oedipus that he was not Merope’s natural son. He himself, before he became a royal servant, was a shepherd. He had been given the baby Oedipus by another shepherd; a servant in Laius’ household. He recognises Oedipus from the marks on his ankles where they were riveted when he was cast away as a baby. Oedipus is now determined to find this shepherd of Laius’ household who gave the messenger his youthful self. The Chorus says that it’s the same shepherd that Oedipus has already sent for; the one who witnessed Laius’ murder. Jocasta is now terrified, although Oedipus still doesn’t put two-and-two together and assumes that she’s frightened in case he proves to be low-born. Jocasta rushes off.

The old Shepherd arrives. He is terrified as soon as he sees the messenger. Oedipus interrogates him brutally and the shepherd reveals that the child was Laius’ own and was given to him by Jocasta herself, justifying her action by the prophecy that the child would kill its father. Oedipus now understands all.

The Chorus reflect on the meaning of all this, when an Attendant arrives and tells them that Jocasta ran to her bridal bed wailing and weeping. Oedipus entered with drawn sword ready to kill her. However, she had pre-empted him by hanging herself. Oedipus pulled out the golden brooches that pinned her dress and put his eyes out with them.

Creon allows the blind Oedipus to see his children, Antigone and Ismene and instructs Oedipus to leave the light of day for the polluted are not allowed to see it. He will not confirm how Jocasta is to be buried, or whether Oedipus is to be banished or put to death as he is awaiting the word of the gods from the oracle. He forces Oedipus to give up his children and walk into the darkness of the palace alone, despite Oedipus’ protests. Creon’s final words are, "Command no more. Obey. Your rule is ended."
10.27.2005
eddie Q supplement

Fate in Iliad and Oedipus Rex

Ming Chuan University
# 22 李孟哲 Eddie Lee
TIME: Thursday 6:30~8:15

Source of material: http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=14677
Two items to be compared or contrasted: 1. Oedipus 2. Achilles

Relationship or class the items share:Fate, Personal Character, Final

Controlling idea: Three + Egotistical + Similarities
(number) (adjective) (noun)

Order of three points of similarity or difference:_v_ general to particular___ climactic

Point of view: The third person Verb tense: PastTone: Familiar Diction: Concrete ; Concise

Outline
Title: The comparison of Oedipus and Achilles

Introduction: Paragraph 1
Thesis statement: Oedipus and Achilles exemplified the portrayal of how a personal characters' fate may lay in their own hands.
Subtopic: The egotistic mindset.

Body: Paragraph 2, 3

Paragraph 2
Topic Sentence: Oedipus' boastful ways were the initiation of his disastrous downfall.
Item 1: His self-esteem felt intruded and he was so enraged he killed the crowd.
Item 2: Thinking that he already knew his true father Oedipus did not know that one of the members of the assembly that he had slaughtered was his own father, King Laius.
Concluding sentence: Destroying his father meant destroying the city he was soon to befriend as their king.

Paragraph 3
Topic Sentence: In the not so tragic fate that Achilles life took, his obsession of his ego and pride was also the cause of the loss of his friend Patroclus.
Item 1: In the proud eyes of Achilles this was a blow to his ego and chose that he would not fight in the war against the Trojans.
Item 2: Before the war Nestor presented the thought of Patroclus wearing Achille's armor and taking his place of battle, so Patroclus followed the suggestion and went into war with Achille`s armor on.
Concluding sentence: Apollo caused Patroclus to drop from his horse and was killed by Hector.

Conclusion
Both of these conceited characters could have saved themselves from sorrow if only they weren't so self-centered and bigheaded.

Summary:
Homer’s Iliad and Sophocles’s Oedipus the King are good examples of how their characters failed to recognize the importance of these maxims and how their reactions affected their lives. Achilles is set upon the emotional side of the mind. His actions and decisions revolve very closely on his emotions, which is usually self-centered. The Oedipus Rex is not so much that Oedipus commits two horrible crimes; after all, he was fated to do so, and committed them unknowingly.

Fate in Iliad and Oedipus Rex In the stories The Iliad and Oedipus Rex, Oedipus and Achilles exemplified the portrayal of how a personal characters' fate may lay in their own hands. The egotistical mindset Oedipus held triggered one of the most tragic turns in his future, resembling Achilles. As for his excess pride, it resulted in the loss of his good friend Patroclus. Oedipus' boastful ways were the initiation of his disastrous downfall. A few years before Oedipus took reign of king, he was requested to step aside while a group of men passed. His self-esteem felt intruded and he was so enraged he killed the crowd. Thinking that he already knew his true father Oedipus did not know that one of the members of the assembly that he had slaughtered was his own father, King Laius. Destroying his father meant destroying the city he was soon to befriend as their king. Oedipus felt as if this curse came from above, as he says in line 1285, "Apollo. Dear children the god was Apollo. He brought my sick, sick fate upon me." But he also believed his ignorance played quite the role in his fate, as in line 700 he says, "I think I may be accursed by my own ignorant edict." In the not so tragic fate that Achilles life took, his obsession of his ego and pride was also the cause of the loss of his friend Patroclus. Agamemnon stole Briseis away from Achilles as revenge for him having to return Chryseis, to her father. In the proud eyes of Achilles this was a blow to his ego and chose that he would not fight in the war against the Trojans. Even though his friends remained in the war, he wished humiliation on Agamemnon. Before the war Nestor presented the thought of Patroclus wearing Achille's armor and taking his place of battle, so Patroclus followed the suggestion and went into war with Achille`s armor on. Apollo caused Patroclus to drop from his horse and was killed by Hector. Both of these conceited characters could have saved themselves from sorrow if only they weren't so self-centered and bigheaded. If Oedipus' self admiring ways wouldn't have blinded him, his fate would have never been as harsh or catastrophic as it turned out to be. In Achilles story, he would have never lost Patroclus if he would have thought about his friends instead on putting himself first.

Reference:
http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=13849
http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=14564
http://www.nd.edu/~observer/01152003/Scene/0.html
http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=32783

Understanding History for Hawthrone and Brent

MCU
黎瑜琳 YuLin Teresa Li
Time: 65264-Thu 8:20-22:05
Presentation 10/27/2005

References:
http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=11017

Title: Understanding History for Hawthorne and Brent

Two items to be compared or contrasted:
1. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl by Linda Brent
2. Any short story written by Nathaniel Hawthorne

Relationship or class the items share: They both show that knowing and understanding social, political, and cultural history is extremely important when reading many novels

Controlling idea: 3+main+similarities or differences
Point of view: The third person
Verb tense: Present
Tone: general to particular
Diction: concrete details, examples

Outline

1. Knowing and understanding social, political, and cultural history is extremely important when reading many novels
A. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl by Linda Brent and any short story written by Nathaniel Hawthorne
B. Both of these authors had many extinuating circumstances surrounding their writings that should be noted before reading their works.

2. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl is an incredible example for what I am trying to show.
A. This book was written during a time of extreme racial segregation and the hatred and cruelty shown, in general, towards blacks from whites is extremely important to understand before reading the story.
B. This book tells the story of the life of a young, black, female slave in the south and focuses on trying to explain the trials, tribulations, and emotional and physical suffering that she, and many others like her, endured while being involuntary members of the institution of slavery.

3. Brent confronts her reader one on one in order to reemphasize her point
A. She uses the family and sentiment to appeal to and challenge the 19th century white women reader in order to effectively gain their support in the movement for abolition.
B. Understanding what was going on in our nation, in the southern states, and in the northern states is incredibly important when reading this story.
C. Slaves were nothing more than property and, in many cases, were treated with less respect than the family dog.

4. Brent deemed it necessary to gain emotional support from her reader.
A. She did this by writing in a way that allowed the reader to be drawn into acquiring a feeling of sympathy for both her and, as she states, her sisters in bondage.
B. She tries to kindle in her readers a flame of passion that will be forever lit and slowly spread throughout the north.

5. Understanding these beliefs and ways of life makes it possible to understand where Hawthorne is coming from.
A. Being a transcendentalist, Hawthorne believed in nature, the oversoul, self- reliance and non- conformity, intuition, social reform and in being idealistic and optimistic. However, his writing style does not really show this.
B. Hawthorne wrote in the same time period as Linda Brent, but his writing style was tremendously different and more individual, while showing an extreme preoccupation with secrets, guilt, and sin.

6. After taking the staff from the devil, Hawthorne remarks about the instinct guiding mortal man to evil rather than good
A. This is a direct statement from the author that he believes that man's natural instinct is to lean towards evil rather than good.
B. There are also numerous occasions in the story when Hawthorne questions his faith through Brown's questioning his faith by listing the examples of religious infractions of his peers.


Summary

When we read a novel, knowing and understanding social, political, and cultural history of the background is extremely important. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, it is imperative to understand the history of slavery, what slaves went through, and how they fought, with every ounce of their being, to end the horrible atrocity known as slavery. In the same way, Hawthorne had can be seen in his short story, "Young Goodman Brown". In this work, through diverse symbolism, also the main character reflects Hawthorne himself. Hawthorne was a transcendentalist for much of his life, though much of the rest of his ancestors were Puritan. Understanding these beliefs and ways of life makes it possible to understand where Hawthorne is coming from. Being a transcendentalist, Hawthorne believed in nature, the oversoul, self- reliance and non- conformity, intuition, social reform and in being idealistic and optimistic. He also shows the importance of knowing the social, political, and cultural history when understanding his work. It can be seen by looking at the beliefs of Hawthorne, and many others, during the time his stories were written. In conclusion,
if we read any works of these authors without knowledge of history is almost a waste of time. On the other hand, deep meaning of the stories cannot be revealed to the reader until he or she knows and understands the social, political, and cultural history of the authors, their respective groups, and of the time period in general.


Title: Understanding History for Hawthorne and Brent


Introduction – paragraph 1
Knowing and understanding social, political, and cultural history is extremely important when reading many novels (Thesis statement), especially Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl by Linda Brent and any short story written by Nathaniel Hawthorne (two items to be compared or contrasted). Both of these authors had many extinuating circumstances surrounding their writings that should be noted before reading their works. Without knowing what was happening both in the outside world and in the respected author's life, one cannot truly grasp what the author is trying to say or what the author truly means by what he or she is saying (Controlling idea). In this paper, I will show how important it is for the reader to understand the social, political, and cultural happenings in the writer's lives and in the world surrounding them during the times that their works were written.


Body – paragraph 2,3,4 and 5
Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl is an incredible example for what I am trying to show (Topic sentence).
Item 1 This book was written during a time of extreme racial segregation and the hatred and cruelty shown, in general, towards blacks from whites is extremely important to understand before reading the story.
Item 2 This book tells the story of the life of a young, black, female slave in the south and focuses on trying to explain the trials, tribulations, and emotional and physical suffering that she, and many others like her, endured while being involuntary members of the institution of slavery. Brent, like every other victim of the atrocity we call slavery, wished those in north would do more to put a stop to this destructive practice (example) As she stated, slavery is de-constructive to all who surround it. It tears apart families; not just families raised in slavery, but the master's family as well. How could the free men and women of the north remain silent while such a great atrocity is still in practice (Concluding sentence) ?

Brent confronts her reader one on one in order to reemphasize her point (Topic sentence).
Item 1 She uses the family and sentiment to appeal to and challenge the 19th century white women reader in order to effectively gain their support in the movement for abolition.
Item 2 Understanding what was going on in our nation, in the southern states, and in the northern states is incredibly important when reading this story. Slaves were nothing more than property and, in many cases, were treated with less respect than the family dog (example). Nonetheless, most northerners did not know this. When white northerners would come down to see how the slaves were being treated, the plantation owners would put on a show (the plantation myth) for the northerners, pretending that the slaves were treated well, not beaten, and were living good lives (example).
Item 3 For the most part, Brent wrote this book to try and show northern whites what was really happening to the slaves in the south and to convince them that slavery was wrong and that something should be done to end this horrid institution. She was looking for northern women that would recognize that they have a duty and an obligation to put a stop to slavery in the south, the trading of slaves in the north, and the recapture of runaway slaves in the north. She not only wanted them to recognize this fact but she wanted them to act upon it and to take into their own hands the duty of putting a stop to the demoralizing, destructive way of life known as slavery (example). This way of life tainted all who took part in it with the horrid stench of evil. This evil stench of slavery was found both on the involuntary members of slavery and, most of all, the voluntary proprietors of the barbaric ritual known as slavery. "O, what days and nights of fear and sorrow that man caused me! Reader, it is not to awaken sympathy for myself that I am telling you truthfully what I suffered in slavery. I do it to kindle a flame of compassion in your hearts for my sisters who are still in bondage, suffering as I once suffered." (Concluding sentence) ?

As represented above, Brent deemed it necessary to gain emotional support from her reader (Topic sentence).
Item 1 She did this by writing in a way that allowed the reader to be drawn into acquiring a feeling of sympathy for both her and, as she states, her sisters in bondage (example).
Item 2 She tries to kindle in her readers a flame of passion that will be forever lit and slowly spread throughout the north. This flame that Brent wished to enlighten in the north, in accordance to her wishes, would put an end to the demoralizing institution of slavery. Without understanding the background and history of this time period, one cannot expect to draw nearly as much out of this story as someone else who knows the social, political, and cultural history that enveloped the world of slavery during this time (Concluding sentence). A great example as to how important it is to know the social, political, and cultural history when understanding the work of Nathaniel Hawthorne can be seen by looking at the beliefs of Hawthorne, and many others, during the time his stories were written. Hawthorne was a transcendentalist for much of his life, though much of the rest of his ancestors were Puritan.

Understanding these beliefs and ways of life makes it possible to understand where Hawthorne is coming from (Topic sentence).
Item 1 Being a transcendentalist, Hawthorne believed in nature, the oversoul, self- reliance and non- conformity, intuition, social reform and in being idealistic and optimistic. (Difference) However, his writing style does not really show this.
Item 2 Hawthorne wrote in the same time period as Linda Brent, but his writing style was tremendously different and more individual, while showing an extreme preoccupation with secrets, guilt, and sin. (Difference) No one is really sure as to why he wrote with such supernatural and dark imagination but some say that it had to do with his feelings towards his ancestors. (Difference) This is another place where knowledge and understanding of Hawthorne's past could help the reader understand what he was really trying to say. Many of Hawthorne's ancestors were Puritans and much of his writing contains obvious Puritan beliefs. His grandfather was a judge who presided over the Salem Witch Trials and Hawthorne felt extremely guilty for what his grandfather had done. He felt so guilty and was so ashamed that he changed his last name, which was formerly Hathorne, by adding a "w"(example). A good example of the ancestoral guilt Hawthorne had can be seen in his short story, "Young Goodman Brown". In this work, through diverse symbolism, Hawthorne writes of a man who, in his coming of age, learns that there is darkness in everyone(example). Upon this coming of knowledge he is forever changed. Hawthorne describes Goodman Brown as a good Puritan who is devoted to his wife, Faith- a name Brown uses to shelter his soul from evil. Through Young Goodman Brown, Hawthorne writes of himself and how, when growing up, he learned of the darkness and wrongdoings of his ancestry. Hawthorne utilizes symbolism to write a story that is purposely open and ambiguous to interpretation. It is rectified for one to perceive that Brown's tribulations are directly related to Hawthorne himself. (Difference) (Concluding sentence)


Conclusion – paragraph 6
After taking the staff from the devil, Hawthorne remarks about the instinct guiding mortal man to evil rather than good (Topic sentence).
This is a direct statement from the author that he believes that man's natural instinct is to lean towards evil rather than good. (Difference)
There are also numerous occasions in the story when Hawthorne questions his faith through Brown's questioning his faith by listing the examples of religious infractions of his peers. It is wondrous how Hawthorne displayed his ancestral guilt through Young Goodman Brown and, without previous knowledge of his history and background, a novice reader would have never made this connection. When reading Hawthorne, the reader should have an extensive knowledge and understanding of the ways of transcendentalists and of the background of Hawthorne's life, as these two historical aspects are only a small piece of the history that allows the reader to probe into the deeper meaning of many of his stories. When reading Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl, it is imperative to understand the history of slavery, what slaves went through, and how they fought, with every ounce of their being, to end the horrible atrocity known as slavery. As I have shown, reading any work by either one of these authors is, almost, a waste of time without knowledge of history, as the true, deep meaning of the stories cannot be revealed to the reader until he or she knows and understands the social, political, and cultural history of the authors, their respective groups, and of the time period in general. (Concluding sentence)



SOURCES:

Brent, Linda. Incidents in the Life of a Slave Girl. 1973. New York, NY. Harcourt Brace.

Hawthorne, Nathanial. Hawthorne's Short Stories. 1946. New York, NY. Random House.

http://www.geocities.com/ibenglish_chs/firstpage.html

References:
http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=16432
http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=11111

Wednesday, October 26, 2005

Free Blacks compared to Slaves

Ming Chuan University
# 19 邱嘉芬 Lobeto Chiu
TIME: Thursday 6:30~8:15
10/27/2005

Source of material: http://www.essaydepot.com/essayme/913/index.php
Topic: Free Blacks compared to Slaves
Two items to be compared or contrasted:
1. Free Blacks in North America. 2. Free Blacks in South America.
Relationship or class the items share:
social status, life style, manner of living
Controlling idea: three + basic + similarities
(number) (adjective) (noun)
Order of three points of similarity or difference:
__V___ general to particular
______ climactic
Point of view: The third person Verb tense: Past tense
Tone: objective Diction: Concrete detail
Thesis statement + enumeration of points of similarity or difference:
The only difference between free slaves is basically the location in which they live in.

Outline:
These paragraphs will compare blacks in the north to blacks in the south in the 1800’. Whites just thought of blacks as dumb and incapable people, they were only capable for menial jobs. They have rights and freedom in either south or north. They are just salves. The only difference between free slaves in basically the location in which they live in.

Body-
Paragraph 2:
Topic sentence: The blacks could not vote, because of stipulations or they were just told that they could not vote by laws of their area.
Supporting details:
In North America
1. The blacks up north had minimal rights.
2. only had menial jobs
In South America
1. were having a tough time getting jobs
2. tried to get the skill jobs they were either turned away or beat up by workers.
Concluding sentence: Whites just thought of blacks as dumb and incapable people, they were only capable for menial jobs.

Paragraph 3:
Topic sentence: Legislators were always creating laws to keep the races divided.
Supporting details:
In North America
1. were separated from their white counterparts in everyway.
2. races divided, segregate school, even the train
In South America
1. had to work all day for no pay
2. were deemed as property, no right to vote and learned.
Concluding sentence: Whites believed that if a slave learned how to read he would be capable to learn how to escape.

Paragraph 4:
Topic sentence: Some slaves were even loaned out.
Supporting details:
In North America
1. some slaves would buy their rights from their masters.
In South America
1. granted permission to live on their own and pay their own board.
Concluding sentence: These types of slaves had no freedom or rights.

Conclusion-
Paragraph 5:
The only difference between free slaves is basically the location in which they live in.

Reference:
1. http://www.essaydepot.com/essayme/913/index.php
2. http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=15380
3. http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=16532

Title: Free Blacks compared to slaves in North and South America
The next few paragraphs will compare blacks in the north to blacks in the south in the 1800’s. In either location blacks were thought of as incompetent and inferior. The next few paragraphs will explain each group’s lifestyle and manner of living. Up north all blacks were free. The population of blacks in the north was about 1% in 1860 after the American Revolution. The blacks up north had minimal rights. The blacks could not vote, because of stipulations or they were just told that they could not vote by laws of their area. The New York Convention created one stipulation that was created to exclude blacks from voting in 1821; the law stated that blacks could not vote if they did not own property. Most blacks were having a tough time getting jobs in the south. So if a black person could not generate income how were they supposed to buy a home? In the north the blacks only had menial jobs. Menial jobs were basically jobs that you needed no skill and received small pay. Jobs of skill were kept away from blacks. If blacks tried to get the skill jobs they were either turned away or beat up by workers. About 95% of blacks in the 1800’s were working menial jobs. The jobs that the blacks acquired were the jobs that whites would not take. Whites just thought of blacks as dumb and incapable people, they were only capable for menial jobs. Blacks in the north were separated from their white counterparts in everyway. Legislators were always creating laws to keep the races divided. Many states tried to impose laws that would segregate schools. The whites did not want black kids going to the same school because if blacks and whites mingled there could be inter marriage. Even the trains were segregated. Negroes had to sit on a certain part of the streetcars and whites on another. Blacks were not allowed to go to certain cities because people thought that they brought down the property value. Imagine people thought just the presence of blacks could bring down property value down. Blacks in the south were not free. Southern blacks were forced to work all day for no pay. As soon as the sunrise the slaves had to work until sunset. Blacks in the south had no choice to take a day off or not. If the weather was good the slaves were usually out working. Southern blacks were also deemed as property. A slave could not leave the farm without permission. If someone ever helped a slave escape they could be charged with theft or even worst. Blacks in the south had no right to vote. Even though blacks represent about 40% of the population in the south they did not have the right to vote. Southern blacks were kept ignorant. Blacks were not allowed to learn to read. It was against the law to teach a slave how to read. Many whites believed that if a slave learned how to read he would be capable to learn how to escape. Some slaves were even loaned out. For example some slaves would buy their rights from their masters and then work for other people for wages. Some slaves were even granted permission to live on their own and pay their own board. These types of slaves had basically the same rights as northern slaves. These types of slaves went as they pleased but still had no freedom or rights. Blacks in no part of the country during the 1800’s were free. If you lived up north you had few rights and many roadblocks on your way to being equal to whites. Granted blacks up north had more rights than those of the south but they still did not have much. The only difference between free slaves is basically the location in which they live in.

Title: The Godfather: Character Comparison

Ming Chuan University
彭宜柔 Zoe Peng
93659026 #3
Time: 65202-Thur 6:30~8:15
Presentation

Title: The Godfather: Character Comparison

Two items to be compared or contrasted: 1. Michael 2. Sonny
Relationship or class the item share: The Godfather
Controlling ideas: Three+ personality, value, temper+ differences
Thesis statement: They are different in areas of personalities, values, and their
tempers.

Introduction- paragraph 1
Topic sentence: At a first glance Michael and Sonny appear to be quite different.
Main idea: Talking about what two characters are different about. Listing the
differences in this paragraph.

Body- paragraph 2
Topic sentence: Their personalities are quite difference.
Main idea: To explain how they are different in their personalities.
Controlling idea: personality
Concrete details: brash, arrogant, calm, cool

Body- paragraph 3
Topic sentence: Their values are another way that they differ.
Main idea: Talking about their difference in values.
Controlling idea: value
Concrete details: man of honor, adulterer

Body- paragraph 4
Topic sentence: Their tempers were not nearly the same.
Main idea: To compare their tempers.
Controlling idea: temper
Concrete details: bad temper, fairly calm

Conclusion- paragraph 5
Topic sentence: Michael and Sonny were two completely different people with
different traits.
Main idea: To sum up the two characters are different in three main ways.

Summary:
In this article, the writer compared two characters of The Godfather in three different ways such as personality, value, and temper. The writer also gave us lots of examples about these main differences. As a reader, I could know the ways they differ.

THE GODFATHER: CHARACTER COMPARISON

Michael Vs. Sonny At a first glance Michael and Sonny appear to be quite different. Upon further observation, however, they have some similarities. Although they are different in areas of personality, values, and their tempers, they are similar in areas of loyalty, their respect for their father, and their strong family ties. Their personalities are quite different. Sonny is brash and arrogant, where Michael is calm and cool. When Don Corleone was in the hospital and Sonny is in charge, the family got kind of careless. He doesn't seem to care what could happen due to his actions. He wants to kill the police captain and doesn't think about the repercussions. Tom has to tell him that it wouldn't be good to kill a cop, but they end up doing it anyway. I think Michael was pushed into it because of his loyalty to the family. He is more calculating in manner. Near the end when he "takes care of all the family business" on the day of the Baptism is a prime example of this. Because he was this way, the objects of his violence had no idea that it was coming. Their values are another way that they differ. Michael is a man of honor. He doesn't run around having affairs with different women. He only marries twice because his first wife was killed in the explosion. Sonny is an adulterer. He is with another women during his sisters wedding, along with a few other times throughout the movie. Their tempers were not nearly the same. Sonny had a bad temper, while Michael did not. Sonny's temper ended up getting him killed. He flew off the handle when he found out that his sister had been beaten and ran out of the house without anyone with him. During those times he should have known better, but all he had on his mind was vengeance. Michael on the other hand is fairly calm about things. He knows that Carlos was involved in Sonny's death, but he lets it go until it is time to deal with it. In conclusion, Sonny and Michael were two completely different people, with different traits. They had different ways of doing things, but in all of that they remained so much the same. I think that has to do with the way their Father brought them up, because I feel that he was the role model that they were molded after.

Reference:
http://www.essaysample.com/essay/002678.html

Tsunami VS Katrina

MCU
#17林育如 Amber 93659470
Time: 65202 18:30-20:15
Presentation Oct 27,2005

Outline
Title: COMPARING RELIEF EFFORTS – TSUNAMI VS KATRINA
Source of material: http://www.behindwoods.com/features/Literature/Literature9/tsunami-vs-katrina.html

Two items to be compared : 1. Tsunami 2.Katrina

Relationship the items share: Both are natural disaster

Thesis statement/Controlling idea: The governments of each nation responded differently;

Subject to be discussed: For the poorest, they asked for immediate help; for the wealthiest, the response was slow and uncaring.

3 major points of differences and similarities:

1. The governments reacted differently.
a. Tsunami wanted to help, but could not, asked for outside help.
b. Katrina reacted with delay although they had the means and the power.

2. Asia is not abusive towards nature as is the USA.

3. In both case, there was loss of human lives and immense destruction: in both case, the poor paid the price, in both, the rich got away.

Paragraph 1:
Topic sentence: The loss is similar, but the impact is different.
Subtopic: The apparent destruction appears huge but the psychological effect is as great.
Main idea: The relief effort should concentrate on both physical and mental.

Paragraph 2~ paragraph 4 (Body)
Topic sentence: The relief workers should provide appropriate and timely efforts.
Both are regular natural phenomena
No man can control any of these natural disaster or prevent these.
The tsunami hit largely under-developed pockets of the world like Indonesia
All of the countries hit were developing nations and the areas hit were poor or part of the main economic wealth such as tourism in Thailand.
International aid flowed in freely as these nations called out for help.
Help flowed in largely due to the press attention and their continuous reports
The world’s richest country stood exposed about its ugly underbelly of skewed development and misplaced priorities.
The USA is the most polluting nation and thus responsible for all of these disasters.
They remain the marginalized and faceless section of American society for whom the government would not go the extra mile so as to bring in quick relief.
Because Katrina hit the poorest area in the US, the governments response was not quick and effective.

Paragraph 5
CONCLUSION:
This is an interesting insight into the type of collaboration / interaction supported by different online communication tools.
The media did not want to show the US in its worst form but all should be done to help.

Summary
The poorest and weakest among us always suffer the most.Leaving aside politics, all should be done to help the victims to return to normal life.


COMPARING RELIEF EFFORTS – TSUNAMI VS KATRINA
Ramaa
E-mail : behindw@behindwoods.com

Any natural calamity evokes a wave of sympathy for the victims. The loss suffered could apparently seem to be similar but the intensity and the impact could be vastly different. The familiar symptoms like loss of lives, homes, belongings, sources of livelihood and access to medical attention present great challenges for relief workers. The psychological impact of the unfortunate incident is more intangible.

The role of relief workers or disaster management professionals is onerous. They shoulder the burden of expectation of battered souls. They should provide appropriate and timely relief. The method of delivery of relief varies with the unique circumstances. In this context, this article analyzes the relief efforts undertaken during the two major calamities, which shook the world recently- the giant tsunami of December 2004 and Hurricane Katrina of September 2005.

Both are regular natural phenomena but this time round they struck with such unprecedented intensity that the entire world was left gaping. The tsunami hit largely under-developed pockets of the world like Indonesia, Sri Lanka and southern India. International aid flowed in freely as these nations called out for help. Men and material were mobilized on an emergency mode so as to bring succour to thousands of victims. While these nationswere found wanting in systems, which could respond smoothly to calamities, the sheer sense of fortitude of the victims complemented the humanistic approach of the relief workers. The giant hurricane Katrina and its successor Rita hit the Louisiana and Texas coast of the USA.

The loss has been estimated to run into thousands of billions of dollars. The world’s richest country stood exposed about its ugly underbelly of skewed development and misplaced priorities. Its unsafe choices with the environment have resulted in compounding the woes of the people in these areas. They remain the marginalized and faceless section of American society for whom the government would not go the extra mile so as to bring in quick relief. The scenes of people huddled in the cold amongst surging waters holding on to anything they perceived precious or the long traffic-choked highways or the traumatized outbursts of the victims remained headline news for about a week. We do not know what became of them afterwards.

Thus, they were conveniently forgotten partly because there has been a subtle agenda in the media not to project the US in bad light. Leaving aside such politics, there should be coordinated efforts to rehabilitate the hurricane victims. Most of them are poor in a wealthy nation which makes their plight pitiable. Let a chorus rise for them.


Reference:
1. http://dormgrandpop.blogspot.com/2005/09/tsunami-vs-katrina.html
2. http://use.perl.org/comments.pl?sid=28431&cid=43072
3. http://craniac.antville.org/stories/1206691/

Battle of the Ants and Shooting an Elephant

MCU
#5 李惠芳 Tess Lee
65264 Time: Th 8:20-10:05
2005/10/27

Source of material: http://www.essays.cc/free_essays/c2/ezk204.shtml
Title: Battle of the Ants and Shooting an Elephant

Two items to be compared or contrasted:
1. Battle of the Ants
2. Shooting an Elephant

Point of view: The first person
Verb tense: Present
Tone: circumspect
Diction: connotative
Order of three points of similarity: general to particular


Relationship or class the items share:
1. Imperialistic view
2. The ways they involve in imperialism
3. Metaphor through animals
4. Their feeling about imperialism

Controlling idea: Four + main + similarities

Outline:
1. Have same imperialism views in both of two stories
2. Both of stories use animals to represent imperialism
3. The true feeling of both characters about imperialism
4. The ways they involve in imperialism
5. Conclusion


Introduction
Paragraph 1
Thesis statement:

Imperialistic view in both “The battle of the Ants” by Thoreau and “Shooting an Elephant” by Orwell, imperialism plays a role. Both authors present, to some degree, their perspectives and feelings about imperialism.
Subtopic sentence:
Orwell and Thoreau both present imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals and insects.

Body
Paragraph 2
Topic sentence:

The authors thus deliberate their introspection on imperialism by either being an imperialistic force or by taking part in imperialism.
Supporting details:
Item 1
In “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell is taking part in imperialism by proving his power and dignity to the natives.
Item 2
In “The Battle of the Ants” Thoreau acts as the imperialist, or emperor, watching over a metaphorical battle between ants in which he never interferes or takes part in.
Concluding sentence:
Thoreau represents imperialism by comparing the “black imperialist “ ants against the “red republican” ants. In “shooting an elephant” the elephant in symbolic of imperialism representing power as an untamed animal that has control over the village.

Paragraph 3
Topic sentence:

In both stories the authors use animals to represent a significant metaphor for imperialism.
Supporting details:
Item 1
In “shooting and elephant” If the narrator lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the village.
Item 2
“The Battle of the Ants” Thoreau never expresses his feelings on imperialism, but uses the ants to metaphorically show how imperialism is unfair.
Concluding sentence:
This comparison leads to the understanding that the power behind imperialism is only as strong as its dominant rulers.

Paragraph 4
Topic sentence:

Orwell and Thoreau both use animals to represent imperialism articulating the narrator’s views in which they are either taking part in imperialism, or taking on the part of an imperialist.
Supporting details:
Item 1
In “Shooting an Elephant” the narrator feels forced by the natives to kill the elephant. The natives take on the role of imperialists as they stand in a big crowd behind him waiting for him to shoot the elephant.
Item 2
In “The Battle of the Ants” Imperialists use their people (metaphorically) as their little plastic figures they send out to fight.
Concluding sentence:
The Empires and Queens have control over them but never take part in the actual fighting, like how the natives never took part in shooting of the elephant.

Paragraph 5
Topic sentence:

The narrators speak of how they are so against imperialism
Supporting details:
Item 1
The narrator became the crowd’s puppet being “pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind.” (Orwell 1837)
Item 2
Thoreau says: “I never learned which party was victorious, nor the cause of the war; but I felt for the rest of the day as if I had my feelings excited and harrowed by witnessing the struggle, the ferocity and carnage of human battle before my door.” (Thoreau 1747)
Concluding sentence:
Imperialists use their people for battle and have no remorse for them. As Thoreau watches over them fighting he realizes the struggle behind human battle and sees imperialism through the perspective of the ferocity that they endure. Thoreau also comes to realize the extent of the Internecine struggles the imperialist and republicans have.

Conclusion
Paragraph 6
In both perspectives each narrator gets a true feeling of imperialism and its divest affects among the people under imperialistic control.

Summary
“The Battle of the Ants” by Thoreau and “Shooting an Elephant” by Orwell both present imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals and insects.

In “Shooting an Elephant” if the narrator lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the village. The narrator became the crowd’s puppet being “pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind.”

In “The Battle of the Ants” Thoreau never expresses his feelings on imperialism, but uses the ants to metaphorically show how imperialism is unfair. Thoreau says: “I never learned which party was victorious, nor the cause of the war; but I felt for the rest of the day as if I had my feelings excited and harrowed by witnessing the struggle, the ferocity and carnage of human battle before my door.”

In both perspectives each narrator gets a true feeling of imperialism and its divest affects among the people under imperialistic control.




Title: Battle of the Ants and Shooting an Elephant

Imperialistic View In both “The Battle of the Ants” by Thoreau and “Shooting an Elephant” by Orwell, imperialism plays a role. Both authors present, to some degree, their perspectives and feelings about imperialism. Orwell and Thoreau both present imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals and insects.

The authors thus deliberate their introspection on imperialism by either being an imperialistic force or by taking part in imperialism. In “The Battle of the Ants” by Thoreau and “Shooting an Elephant” by Orwell, both authors use metaphors to represent their perspectives on imperialism. In “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell is taking part in imperialism by proving his power and dignity to the natives. In “The Battle of the Ants” Thoreau acts as the imperialist, or emperor, watching over a metaphorical battle between ants in which he never interferes or takes part in. Thoreau represents imperialism by comparing the “black imperialist “ ants against the “red republican” ants. In “shooting an elephant” the elephant in symbolic of imperialism representing power as an untamed animal that has control over the village.

In both stories the authors use animals to represent a significant metaphor for imperialism. Orwell uses a large and very powerful animal to represent imperialism, while Thoreau uses a small yet strong animal. This comparison leads to the understanding that the power behind imperialism is only as strong as its dominant rulers. In “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell represents the elephant as a force greater than the narrator has the ability to kill. It takes the narrator several shots to kill him, and a prolonged period of time for him to die. The elephants controlling force over the narrator is compared to that of an imperialist. Orwell is faced with a very important decision of whether or not he should shoot the elephant. If he does so, he will be a hero to his people. In turn, he would be giving in to the imperial force behind the elephant that he finds so unjust and evil. If the narrator lets the elephant go free and unharmed the natives will laugh at him and make him feel inferior for not being able to protect the village. In “The Battle of the Ants” Thoreau never expresses his feelings on imperialism, but uses the ants to metaphorically show how imperialism is unfair. Thoreau describes the black ants as the imperialists who are larger and stronger compared to the red ants that represent the republicans. Thoreau describes the agonizing battle that is going on outside his door and watches as the black imperialist ants fight to a harrowing death, or victory, showing how neither side is willing to give up.

Orwell and Thoreau both use animals to represent imperialism articulating the narrator’s views in which they are either taking part in imperialism, or taking on the part of an imperialist. In “The Battle of the Ants” Thoreau takes on the role of the imperialist while in “Shooting an Elephant” Orwell is taking part in imperialism. In “Shooting an Elephant” the narrator feels forced by the natives to kill the elephant. The natives take on the role of imperialists as they stand in a big crowd behind him waiting for him to shoot the elephant. Imperialists use their people (metaphorically) as their little plastic figures they send out to fight. The Empires and Queens have control over them but never take part in the actual fighting, like how the natives never took part in shooting of the elephant.

The narrator speaks of how he is so against imperialism, but gives in to the natives by shooting the elephant to prove he is strong and to avoid humiliation. The natives only use the narrator to attain the elephant’s meat and tusks. The narrator became the crowd’s puppet being “pushed to and fro by the will of those yellow faces behind.” (Orwell 1837) In “The Battle of the Ants” Thoreau acts as an imperialist watching the ants do battle over each other. As a narrator, Thoreau has a larger more powerful stance over the ants. At the end of the story Thoreau’s thoughts on imperialism are those of experience. Thoreau says: “I never learned which party was victorious, nor the cause of the war; but I felt for the rest of the day as if I had my feelings excited and harrowed by witnessing the struggle, the ferocity and carnage of human battle before my door.” (Thoreau 1747) Imperialists use their people for battle and have no remorse for them. As Thoreau watches over them fighting he realizes the struggle behind human battle and sees imperialism through the perspective of the ferocity that they endure. Thoreau also comes to realize the extent of the Internecine struggles the imperialist and republicans have.

Thoreau and Orwell both play distinctive roles in the parts of imperialism. In both perspectives each narrator gets a true feeling of imperialism and its divest affects among the people under imperialistic control. In both “The Battle of the Ants” and “Shooting an Elephant” the authors express their views on imperialism metaphorically through the use of animals and insects. The two different points of represented as either being an imperialistic force or by being an active part of imperialism.

Reference: http://www.essays.cc/free_essays/c2/ezk204.shtml
Reference: http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=19913
Reference: http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=10459

A Comparison of the Short Stories, "Windows" and "A Devoted Son"

MCU
游涵鈞 Cherie 93659425 #25
Time: 65265-Thu.20:20-22:05
Comparison Presentation 27th-Oct-2005

Source of material:
http://essayinfo.com/sample/essay/15/
Two items to be compared: two short stories 1. "Windows" 2."A Devoted Son"
Relationship or class the items share: character's growing background, emotion, family
Controlling idea: three universal similarities
Order of three points of similarity: general to particular
Point of view: Third person
Verb tense: Past
Tone: Straight-forward
Diction: Concise, Concrete

OUTLINE
Title: A Comparison of the Short Stories, "Windows" and "A Devoted Son"
Introduction: ¶1
Thesis statement: The two stories "Windows" and "Devoted Son" both have the same universal theme.
Subtopic: Happiness is not based on wealth or material objects.
Subtopics sentences: When Leah was growing up she lived in poverty but was still happy where as the old man was wealthy yet still unhappy. Leah and the old man became happy emotionally not materialistically, and both Leah's and the old man's families were materialistic and unhappy.

Body: ¶2, 3, 4
Paragraph 2:
Topic sentence: no specific topic sentence; refer to paragraph1-When Leah was growing up she lived in poverty but was still happy where as the old man was wealthy yet still unhappy.
Item1: Leah grew up on a small farm in Estonia, and not very wealthy.
Item2: The old man lived with his wealthy son.
Concluding sentences: None of these things require money. The old man had everything one can acquire with wealth, but none of these things could make him happy.

Paragraph3:
Topic sentence: Leah and the old man found happiness emotionally, not materialistically.
Item1: The window itself did not make Leah happy, but what the window represented did.
Item2: The old man had everything from great wealth to great healthcare to prolong his life, but he could not find happiness through these things.
Concluding sentence: He did not need money or nice things to reach happiness.

Paragraph4:
Topic sentence: Leah's family was very materialistic. The old man's family was also very materialistic.
Item1: They lived in poverty and believed that if they had nice things and a nice house they would be happy.
Item2: The son had lived in poverty, and had the idea that if he got a nice job that paid a lot of money, he could buy nice things which would make him happy in life.
Concluding sentence: This is true because not once in the story when he was rich didn't say he was happy, the only happiness he experienced was when he was poor.

Conclusion: ¶5
Having nice things and a lot of money does not provide true happiness.

Summary:
This article compared the similarities of two short stories. The stories were about the general idea that what do people think about happiness. In "Windows", Leah grew up in a poor, materialistic and unhappy family, but she was satisfied and enjoyed her life. She found happiness from her positive attitude. In "A Devoted Son", the old man lived with his wealthy and materialistic son. He could get everything he wanted, but he was unhappy. They became happy by emotion not material things. Poor doesn't bring unhappiness, but rich doesn't bring happiness either.


A Comparison of the Short Stories, "Windows" and "A Devoted Son"

The two stories "Windows" and "Devoted Son" both have the same universal theme. Happiness is not based on wealth or material objects. When Leah was growing up she lived in poverty but was still happy where as the old man was wealthy yet still unhappy. Leah and the old man became happy emotionally not materialistically, and both Leah's and the old man's families were materialistic and unhappy.

Leah grew up on a small farm in Estonia, and was not very wealthy. She had to share a bed with her sisters. Even though she did not have a lot of money, she was still happy and enjoyed life. She found happiness through playing with her sisters and friends, and from the beauty of nature. None of these things require money. The old man lived with his wealthy son. He had everything money could buy; a nice house, nice car, nice things. One thing that made him very happy was food. He could have any dish he wanted where he lived, but he was not allowed to eat anything he liked. The old man had everything one can acquire with wealth, but none of these things could make him happy.

Leah and the old man found happiness emotionally, not materialistically. The window itself did not make Leah happy, but what the window represented did. The window represented her youth, which made her remember her happiness as a child. The window reminded her of happy she was, and reminiscing about her past made her feel that happiness again. The old man had everything from great wealth to great healthcare to prolong his life, but he could not find happiness through these things. His idea of happiness was living life to the fullest until the end, but he did not get to. It reached a point where he could not do anything that made him happy because it was all bad for his health. He was so miserable that the only thing that could make him happy was death, and it did. He did not need money or nice things to reach happiness.

Leah's family was very materialistic. They lived in poverty and believed that if they had nice things and a nice house they would be happy. That's why Leah's daughter in law constantly went shopping and is also why she kept listening to the stories on the radio. The stories on the radio would obviously be about rich, or anyone who is not poor, and the stories would most likely be the classic Hollywood style, where everyone is happy and everything ends up nicely. She believes that anyone who isn't poor lives like that, so she believes she would also be happy in the same way. The old man's family was also very materialistic. The son had lived in poverty, and had the idea that if he got a nice job that paid a lot of money, he could buy nice things which would make him happy in life. To achieve this goal he had to fight very hard. So hard that once he got what he wanted, he realized that the reward was not worth the fight. This is true because not once in the story when he was rich didn't say he was happy, the only happiness he experienced was when he was poor.

Having nice things and a lot of money does not provide true happiness. Leah was happy when she was poor and the old man was unhappy when he was rich. Leah and the old man became happy emotionally not materialistically, and both of their families were very materialistic but the old man's rich family was just as unhappy as Leah's poor family.

Reference:

1. http://essayinfo.com/sample/essay/15/
2. http://essayinfo.com/sample/essay/16/
3. http://www.essaysample.com/essay/000077.html

Comparison of Araby and A&P

MCU
Josie Shen 沈倩君
65264 Thursday 8:20~10:05
Comparison essay presentation 10/27/2005

Source of material:http://mt.middlebury.edu/middblogs/colcer/ceylan/004434.html
Two items to be compared or contrasted:1. Araby. 2. A&P.
Relationship or class the items share:the settings, the characters and the realizations
Controlling idea:3 + basic + similarities
Order of three points of similarity or difference:
_ V___ general to particular
______ climactic
Point of view: The third person
Verb tense:Present
Tone:Straight-forward
Diction:Concrete, Vivid

Thesis statement + enumeration of points of similarity or difference (my be 1 or 1 sentences):Araby and A&P are both short stories, written by famous authors. Although they were written in different times, as well as in different countries, they have many similarities.

OUTLINE
Title:Comparison of Araby and A&P
Paragraph 1 (Introduction)
Topic Sentence:Although they were written in different times, as well as in different countries, they have many similarities.
Subtopic sentence:These similarities can be found both in their contexts and their settings.

Paragraph 2~5(Body)
Paragraph 2:Compare their settings.
Topic sentence:What catches the readers’ attention in both stories first, are the settings.
Item 1:
1. uses many negative words while describing the setting.
2. the dullness and the gloominess of that city
Transitional expression + Item 2:
1. Similarly, Sammy in A&P describes the town he lives in by referring to everyone around him as sheep, vividly describing the distinction between the beach and his town.
2. a small town with many mostly older people who lead uneventful lives, and a young boy who has lived there and worked in the same shop all his life.
Concluding sentence:In this way we know that both characters are not happy with the lives they are leading. They have no ambitions and nothing to hold on to. Everything they talk about wounds too simple.

Paragraph 3, 4:Compare their characters.
Topic sentence:With nothing to hold on to, both characters are in search of something that will give them the courage to do something different, something that will spice up their lives.
Item 1:
1. the escape from his boring everyday life comes with his love for a girl.
2. the only light in his dark life, his only source for joy.
3. devotes himself to this girl so much that she becomes a god-like figure.
4. feels like it is his duty and responsibility to make the girl happy.
Transitional expression + Item 2:
1. The same thing happens to Sammy when the three girls in bathing suits come into the store that he is working at.
2. The leading girl of the group, is different from everyone he knows in the town.
3. He is fascinated by her.
4. the long-awaited lights in Sammy's life.
5. In the same way, Sammy in A&P quits his job, thinking he is now the girl's hero.
Concluding sentence:The boys, finally having found something to fight for. They feel themselves as their saviors.

Paragraph 5:Compare their realization.
Topic sentence:It is not long before both of them realize that it was not actually worth it, and that what they had imagined weren't actually true.
Item 1:
1. he is not capable of doing what he was trying to do.
2. never going to be the lover of the girl he loved.
3. The boy is angry with himself.
Transitional expression + Item 2:
1. Sammy realizes that in reality he can not do anything else other than to be cashier at a supermarket.
2. and Sammy was never the girl’s hero.
3. and Sammy doesn’t know what to do next.
Concluding sentence:More importantly, now they both know that getting away by themselves will not be as easy as they had imagined it to be.

Paragraph 6(Conclusion)
Although the intentions of the boys in both stories are the same, they try different ways in the hope of breaking free from the unpleasant environments which they were born into, only to realize that they have to try harder.

Summary
Araby and A&P are both short stores and written by very famous authors in different times and countries. The protagonists are the young boys, and they have many similarities, such as their settings, characters, and realizations. The boys start to change their life and values when they meet the girls. Both of them would like to escape from their ordinary and unpleasant life, but finally they found they are not capable to do that. They feel very upset and depressed about life.

Comparison of Araby and A&P

Araby and A&P are both short stories, written by famous authors. Although they were written in different times, as well as in different countries, they have many similarities. These similarities can be found both in their contexts and their settings. Both stories are about young men, leading dull lives, and who go through a major change by the end of the story, while trying to get away from their lives. In both stories this change takes place while trying to please a female who triggers something inside them, causing them to act. Araby and A&P are stories of unsuccessful attempts to escape from ordinary lives, only in different ways.

What catches the readers’ attention in both stories first, are the settings. In both stories the protagonists describe the neighborhoods and the daily life in the cities that they live in, in detail. While they make these descriptions, telling the reader about the neighborhood through their eyes, they also give information about their mindscapes, and we understand what they think of the places they live in. The boy in Araby uses many negative words while describing the setting. ‘‘...uninhabited...blind end...detached...imperturbable...dark...muddy ( pg 427)’’ That is how we empathize with him: being able to picture the dullness and the gloominess of that city in Ireland, and also its detachedness from other places. Similarly, Sammy in A&P describes the town he lives in by referring to everyone around him as sheep, vividly describing the distinction between the beach and his town, which causes us to again picture a small town with many mostly older people who lead uneventful lives, and a young boy who has lived there and worked in the same shop all his life. ‘‘...all three of them went up to the cat-and-dog-food-breakfast-cereal-macaroni-rice-raisins-seasonings-spreads-spaghetti-soft drinks-crackers-and-cookies aisle.’’(pg 865) In this way we know that both characters are not happy with the lives they are leading. They have no ambitions and nothing to hold on to. Everything they talk about sounds too simple.

With nothing to hold on to, both characters are in search of something that will give them the courage to do something different, something that will spice up their lives. For the boy in Araby, the escape from his boring everyday life comes with his love for a girl. She is the only light in his dark life, his only source for joy. He devotes himself to this girl so much that she becomes a god-like figure. ‘‘The light from the lamp caught the white curve on her neck, lit up her hair that rested there and, falling, lit up the hand upon the railing.(pg 429)’’ The same thing happens to Sammy when the three girls in bathing suits come into the store that he is working at. The leading girl of the group, who he calls ‘Queeny’, is different from everyone he knows in the town. He is fascinated by her. ‘...just her, this clean bare plane of the top of her chest down from the shoulder bones like a dented sheet of metal tilted in the light. I mean, it was more than pretty. (pg 865)’’ The girl is the long-awaited lights in Sammy’s life.

Since they are fascinated by these girls so much, the boys can’t stand their being sad. The girl in Araby is sad because she is not able to go to a festival that she wants to go to, where as ‘Queenie’ is sad because she has been scolded in front of everyone by the manager of the market. The boys, finally having found something to fight for. They feel themselves as their saviors. The boy in Araby feels like it is his duty and responsibility to make the girl happy. ‘‘I imagined that I bore my chalice safely through a throng of foes. (pg 428)’’ In the same way, Sammy in A&P quits his job, thinking he is now the girl’s hero, who stood up against his boss to save her from the embarassment. ‘‘So I say ‘I quit’ to Lengel quick enough for them to hear, hoping they’ll stop and watch me, their unsuspected hero. (pg 868)’’

It is not long before both of them realize that it was not actually worth it, and that what they had imagined weren’t actually true. The boy realizes that he is not capable of doing what he was trying to do. He is too young to be buying a gift with the little money he has, from a big bazaar, and for a girl much older that he is. Sammy realizes that in reality he can not do anything else other than to be a cashier at a supermarket. They both understand that they were not actually who they thought they were. The boy in Araby was never going to be the lover of the girl he loved, and Sammy was never the girls’ hero. After these realizations they both find themselves in an emptiness, having suddenly lost the mission of their lives. The boy is angry with himself (I saw myself as a creature driven and derided by vanity; and my eyes burned with anguish and anger(pg 431)) and Sammy doesn’t know what to do next. ‘‘My stomach kind of fell as I felt how hard the world was going to be to me hereafter.(pg 869)’’ But they both know it is going to be hard to recover. More importantly, now they both know that getting away by themselves will not be as easy as they had imagined it to be.

Araby and A&P are stories about escapes from ordinary lives by holding on to ideas which are in fact not real. Although the intentions of the boys in both stories are the same, they try different ways in the hope of breaking free from the unpleasant environments which they were born into, only to realize that they have to try harder.

Reference:
1. http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=15638
2. http://www.freeessays.cc/db/42/saq112.shtml
3. http://mt.middlebury.edu/middblogs/ycui/ycui/005261.html

The Mall VS Downtown

MCU
Ariel 林芯妤 93659354
#10, Thu-06:30~08:15pm

The Mall VS. Downtown
Point of view:Third person
Verb tense:Present
Thesis statement:
Since the 1950s, American shoppers have been spending their money in suburban malls instead of in downtown business districts.

First paragraph:Introduction
Topic sentence:Americans don't like weather.
Concrete detail:They like to be indoors whenever possible. Never seeing the sun from the time they first enter until they leave.


Second paragraph:Body
Topic sentence:Americans love convenience and, except during the crush of major holidays, malls
offer plenty of convenient parking.
Concrete detail:For cars that circle in search of the closest slot and an easy entrance. Plenty of docking points.

Third paragraph:Body
Topic sentence:The mall offers an extraordinary variety of products under its one gigantic roof.
Concrete detail:Specialty stores and boutiques offer items that people don't realize they
need until they're put under the spell of brightly lighted, beautifully urnished window after window of beguiling wares

Fourth paragraph:The final description for mall
Topic sentence:The mall feels safe
Concrete detail:it is lighted, warm, dry, busy.

Fifth to eighth paragraph:Body
Topic sentence:Comparing the downtown
Concrete detail:Sad repair, parking difficult,

Final paragraph:Conclusion
Topic sentence:The truth is that the American mall grows where it does because someone with
enormously deep pockets decides to plunk it down where there used to be woods
or a golf course.
Concrete detail:convenient parking, freedom weather, awful price.

Summary:It’s an essay compare the shopping place between mall and downtown in America. Seems there are many difference but interesting points such like service, convenient, and products etc.

Recourse from :http://www.123helpme.com/



The Mall VS Downtown

Since the 1950s, American shoppers have been spending their money in suburban malls instead of in downtown business districts. This is even true of shoppers who have to go out of their way to shop in the malls; they will bypass downtown stores (which they might have gotten to by convenient bus) to drive to the brightly bedecked and weather-free meccas of shopper-heaven. The result, some people claim, is the demise of the central urban commercial district, Downtown, a process leading inevitably toward more widespread urban blight. But why are Americans are so easily lured to shop in malls in the first place? First, Americans don't like weather. They like to be indoors whenever possible, even on nice days, and they're willing to pay a premium to be protected from the elements. If they can find someone who can afford it, they will even put their sports stadiums under a gigantic bowl, and they love to stay indoors for a day of shopping, perhaps never seeing the sun from the time they first enter until they leave, hours later, relieved of money, oxygen, and much money.

Second, Americans love convenience and, except during the crush of major holidays, malls offer plenty of convenient parking. A happy, enormous island of commerce in a sea of asphalt, the mall offers plenty of docking points - usually next to major commercial outlets - for cars that circle in search of the closest slot and an easy entrance.
Third, the mall offers an extraordinary variety of products under its one gigantic roof. Specialty stores and boutiques offer items that people don't realize they need until they're put under the spell of brightly lighted, beautifully furnished window after window of beguiling wares. Malls are built to respond to Americans' insatiable desire for stuff; either that, or a generation of Americans has been genetically engineered to respond to the sellers of stuff. Either way, it works.

And finally, the mall feels safe: it is lighted, warm, dry, busy. Senior citizens are invited to do their walking exercises there in the early hours; physically challenged people easily meander the smooth floors of curbless, stairless businesses in motorized carts; children are amused by clowns and fed at convenient cafeterias in Food Court.
America's Downtown, on the other hand, is often in sad repair. Parking is difficult, if not dangerous, and until you get through the door, it's all outdoors. To get from store to store, you must expose yourself to heat, cold, rain, snow. There are sometimes solicitors to fleece you of change before you even get into a store. If there is a plan here, it is not evident to most shoppers. Where is the information kiosk with a cordial, well-informed attendant to direct you to the nearest clothier, jeweler, fast-food outlet, or bathroom? Is there a bathroom?
What is left in the American Downtown to recommend it to shoppers? Practically nothing. Nothing, that is, unless you regard as important the notion that the businesses you give your money to should be owned by people, families, in your own community. Yes, there may be chain-stores; it seems there has always been a W. T. Grants, a J. C. Penneys, a Whackers. But the people who owned the franchise and worked behind the cash register were people you might meet in your own neighborhood. When you walk into the Downtown hardware store, you often feel wood, not vinyl linoleum, beneath your feet. And some old guy, who seemed old when he sold your father the hammer you use today, will sell you nails in a paper bag, weighing them out by the handful until you get the exact number you need, not the arbitrary number that comes in a hermetically sealed plastic box.
Next door, in the department store, there will be two women who know you by name and who can't wait to help you find what you need or will let you ruminate among the shelves if you want. In the drug store across the street, the pharmacist knows your aches and pains and what you've been taking for them the last five years and what upsets your stomach and knows to call your doctor when the prescription doesn't make sense. If there is a soda fountain there - naah, that's asking too much.
The truth is that the American mall grows where it does because someone with enormously deep pockets decides to plunk it down where there used to be woods or a golf course. He surrounds it with hundreds of acres of parking and waits for people to come spend their money, as he knows they will because people will do what mass advertising tells them to do. Downtown, on the other hand, grew where it did because there was an organic need for it. It was a community's response to a community's needs - neighbors responding to neighbors - and it flourished as the community flourished. If the mall can replace this sense of community, then so be it; it deserves our affection as well as our dollars. If it can't, then we have gained convenient parking and freedom from the weather at an awful price.

Tuesday, October 25, 2005

The Struggle as Depicted in The Color Purple and Desiree's Baby

MCU
#23 王珍玉 Wang, Chen-Yu
Time: 65264 Th 8:20-10:05
2005/10/27

Source of material: http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=5288

Title: The Struggle as Depicted in The Color Purple and Desiree’s Baby
Two items to be compared or contrasted :
1. The Color Purple
2. Desiree’s Baby
Relationship or class the items share: show unconditional love, experienced hardship, and dealing with children
Controlling idea: three + basic + similarity
(number) (adjective) (noun)
Order of three points of similarity or difference:
_v_ general to particular
___ climactic

Point of view: The first person
Verb tense: Present
Tone: Objective
Diction: Concrete detail, Example

Main Idea
The Color Purple written by Alice Walker and Kate Chopin’s Desiree’s Baby, were written during different times periods yet there are many similarities on how the women struggled.

Outline
I. Unconditional love
A. Nettie and Cellie’s in The Color Purple
B. Desiree and Madame Valmonde in Desiree’s Baby
II. Experienced hardship
A. Women treated like second-class citizens
B. Nettie raped by her father
C. Desiree get hurt from her husband’s rage
III. Dealing with children
A. Both had wonderful children that were not accepted in their society
1. Nettie’s baby is a victim of incest
2. Desiree’s baby looks like African American

Introduction-
paragraph 1
Thesis statement
The Color Purple written by Alice Walker and Kate Chopin’s Desiree’s Baby, were written during different times periods yet there are many similarities on how the women struggled.
Subtopic sentence
It goes to show that novels can span totally different time periods and still could discuss the same things.

Body-
Paragraph 2:
Topic sentence
The unconditional love within families can be enough at times to keep people going during the hard times that they experience.
Supporting detail:
In the Color Purple
1. helped them deal with the troubles they both faced.
2. helped Nettie live with her verbally and physically abusive husband.
Desiree’s Baby
1. Desiree on the other hand not being blood related to the women she called her mother; Madame Valmonde still had a tremendous amount of love for her.
Concluding sentence
This is showing that it doesn’t take blood to create a strong bond and that no matter what; unconditional love will always help you get through hard times.

Paragraph 3:
Topic sentence
During the different times that both stories were written the way that African Americans were treated were quite similar.
Supporting detail:
In the Color Purple
1. they were just figured to be a caretaker and a maid.
2. she was considered to be dumb
Desiree’s Baby
1. It was a horrible thing to be African American and a woman during that time.
2. her husband shunned her and wanted nothing to do with her.
Concluding sentence
Women in both time periods were treated like second-class citizens; African American women were treated worse.

Paragraph 4:
Topic sentence
They both had wonderful children that were not accepted in their society.
Supporting detail:
In the Color Purple
1. Nettie, her father rape her
2. sell the children to families.
Desiree’s Baby
1. When her husband noticed that their baby looked African American he became very angry with his wife.
Concluding sentence
Everyday there are people that aren’t accepted didn’t only happen during the writing of these novels.

Conclusion-
paragraph 5
The lesson of the two books is that the power of love to enable people to overcome hurt and hardship.

Summary

This is the essay about comparison tow different novels, “The Color Purple” and “Desiree’s Baby”. They were written in different time’s periods but are many similarities on how the women struggled. The author indicated three basic similarities in these two novels. First, the main character Nettie in “The Color Purple” who own unconditional love with her sister Cellie. And the Desiree in “Desiree’s Baby” are also own unconditional love from her mother Madame Valmonde. Moreover, the two characters are also experience some hardship. Such as, Nettie’s father rapes her and Desiree’s husband shunned her because her baby’s skin color. Concluding, both character have the baby that unaccepted by the society. In the end, the author think the power of love can enable people to overcome hurt and hardship.

Title: The Struggle as Depicted in The Color Purple and Desiree’s Baby

The Color Purple written by Alice Walker and Kate Chopin’s Desiree’s Baby, were written during different times periods yet there are many similarities on how the women struggled. Both stories depict women who experienced hardship, and through out it all they continued to show unconditional love. In the two stories they have instances dealing with children that are quite similar. It goes to show that novels can span totally different time periods and still could discuss the same things.

The unconditional love within families can be enough at times to keep people going during the hard times that they experience. This holds true between sisters. In The Color Purple Nettie and Cellie's unconditional love for one another helped them deal with the troubles they both faced. There unconditional love was shown through Cellie’s relentless writing hoping that one of her letters would get through. At no point did she ever give up. This love helped Nettie live with her verbally and physically abusive husband, Albert. Desiree on the other hand not being blood related to the women she called her mother; Madame Valmonde still had a tremendous amount of love for her. When Desiree’s husband told her to leave her mother said to her, “ Come home to Valmonde; back to your mother who loves you”. This is showing that it doesn’t take blood to create a strong bond and that no matter what; unconditional love will always help you get through hard times.

During the different times that both stories were written the way that African Americans were treated were quite similar. Back in 1909 when The Color Purple took place it was before woman were really seen as what they are and they were just figured to be a caretaker and a maid. The fact that Nettie was black didn’t help because she was considered to be dumb while in fact she was intelligent. During her years when she was married to Albert she with a little help of her sister Cellie learned how to read. Slavery was taking place during the period Desiree’s baby was written in. It was a horrible thing to be African American and a woman during that time. When it was thought that Desiree was an African American her husband shunned her and wanted nothing to do with her. In fact he was the one that turned out to be the one that had the African American genes in him. The ignorance that he showed cost him his wife and his child. Women in both time periods were treated like second-class citizens; African American women were treated worse.

The two women had experiences with children in the stories. They both had wonderful children that were not accepted in their society. In The Color Purple Nettie was being a victim of incest. Her father would rape her and then when she gave birth to his children he would sell the children to families. While Desiree was in a seemingly loving marriage that didn’t change the way that her husband reacted. When her husband noticed that their baby looked African American he became very angry with his wife. He initially thought that she had African American genes when in fact he was the one that had African American genes. It was on his mother side as stated in a letter to his father from his mother “Armond will never know that his mother, who adores him, belongs to the race that is cursed wit the brand of slavery” Before he figured this out, he had already sent his wife and child away never to be seen again. Everyday there are people that aren’t accepted didn’t only happen during the writing of these novels.

The two novels The Color Purple and Desiree’s baby gave the reader a good representation of the struggles that African American’s and women went through. Times have surely changed since then. In order to move forward you must always understand your past. These two novels give the reader a great representation of what life was like back than. The power of unconditional was a great force to help the women and the African American deal with the horrible trouble they experienced during their struggles. The lesson of the two books is that the power of love to enable people to overcome hurt and hardship.

Other reference:
1. Oedipus vs. Hamlet as Tragic Protagonists http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=9652

2. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer http://www.123helpme.com/view.asp?id=16138